Waitlist open · Teams & Reviewers

AI writes the code. Someone still has to review it.

Verdiq puts a vetted senior engineer on your pull request. Real human judgment, delivered in under 24 hours. No headcount, no retainer, from $30 per Pull Request.

Get my Pull Requests reviewedEarn reviewing code
NDA-signed reviewersDiff only, never the repoManually vetted
Pull Request #482 · checkout-service
SIZE M
payments/charge.ts
23async function charge(order) {
24- const r = await stripe.charge(order.total)
24+ const key = order.id + ':' + order.attempt
25+ const r = await stripe.charge(order.total, { idempotencyKey: key })
26
27 return r.status
28}
MT
Marcus T.
Senior Backend Engineer · 9y
CHANGES REQUESTED

Retried checkouts will double-charge here: there's no idempotency key on the Stripe call. Added one tied to order.id. This is the kind of bug that only surfaces in production.

ArchitectureHigh impact
Mark as valuable
+199%
time spent on code review since AI coding took off · Faros AI, 2026
31%
of pull requests are merged with no review at all
44%
of teams say slow review is their #1 bottleneck · LinearB, 8M Pull Requests

The problem

Your team ships more code than ever. Review hasn't kept up.

AI assistants multiplied the volume of pull requests overnight. But every Pull Request still needs a human who understands architecture, business logic, and long-term consequences. That human, usually your most senior engineer, has become the bottleneck. Verdiq gives you senior engineers on demand, without adding them to your payroll.

Why a human

Use AI for the routine. Verdiq for what matters.

AI review tools are fast and cheap at catching the obvious. They consistently miss the decisions that actually cost you. The two aren't rivals. They cover different ground.

AI review tools

CodeRabbit, Copilot & co.

  • Style, lint & formatting in seconds
  • Obvious bugs & convention checks
  • Nearly free, on every commit
  • Misses architectural trade-offs
  • Blind to business-logic intent
  • No accountability for the verdict

Verdiq · human review

vetted senior engineers

  • Judges architecture & trade-offs
  • Reads business logic & intent
  • Catches what surfaces only in prod
  • A named engineer owns the verdict
  • Delivered in under 24 hours
  • From $30. Pay only when you need it

How it works

Simple for both sides

For engineering teams

  1. 1
    Upload your Pull Request & the context
    Paste the Pull Request URL, drop the diff, and add the business context a reviewer needs to give a valid verdict.
  2. 2
    Pay the base rate, no subscription
    Size is calculated from your diff. You see the price before you pay. No seats, no minimums.
  3. 3
    Get detailed feedback in less than 24h
    A vetted senior engineer delivers actionable comments. Mark findings as valuable to reward great work.

For senior developers

  1. 1
    Apply with your GitHub profile
    We review your experience and run a short audit on a public OSS Pull Request to verify your standard. No anonymous reviewers.
  2. 2
    Pick the Pull Requests that match your stack
    Browse the open queue filtered by technology and size. Claim the Pull Requests where your expertise adds real value.
  3. 3
    Deliver your review. Get paid.
    Keep 80% of the base rate. Bonuses for findings marked valuable, and tips, go 100% to you.

Pricing

Pay per Pull Request. No surprises.

Size is calculated automatically from the diff. You see the price before paying.

SizeLines changedPrice
SLess than 150$30
MBetween 150 and 500$60
LBetween 500 and 1,000$100
XLMore than 1,000$160

Reviewers keep 80% of the base rate. Bonuses for valuable findings and tips go 100% to the reviewer.

Security & trust

Your code stays yours.

Sharing code with an outside engineer is a real decision. We designed every step to shrink the surface of trust you have to extend.

NDA at registration
Every reviewer signs a non-disclosure agreement before accessing any Pull Request. L and XL Pull Requests add a project-specific NDA.
Diff only, never the repo
Reviewers see only the changed lines, never your full codebase, history, or any other file. It caps the blast radius.
Manually vetted reviewers
Every reviewer passes an audit review before their first Pull Request. We verify their standard, identity, and experience.
Enforced accountability
Every NDA carries an indemnification clause. Confirmed breach means instant suspension and immediate notice to you.

FAQ

Common questions

For engineering teams

For reviewers

General

What's coming

Beta is just the start.

The beta ships the core loop: submit a Pull Request, get a senior verdict in under 24 hours. Here is what we are building toward.

GitHub & GitLab integration

Submit Pull Requests straight from your repo. No more downloading and uploading diffs by hand.

Review dashboard

A full history of your reviews, findings, and the patterns that recur across your team over time.

Reviewer and client chat

Ask follow-up questions and clarify context without ever leaving the platform.

Team credit packs

Buy reviews in bulk for your team. Simpler billing and better rates as you scale.

AI-assisted reviewer vetting

Automated audits using synthetic Pull Requests with planted issues, plus domain-specific evaluation for fintech, SaaS, and more, so every reviewer's standard is provable.

Early access

Be first when we launch.

We're building the beta with a small group of teams and reviewers. Tell us which side you're on and we'll reach out when we're ready for you.

No spam. No sales calls. Just an email when beta is ready.